Talk:List of Miami Vice episodes

Television: Episode coverage Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Notable Info

Hello, some information was incorrect, which I have corrected. Please advise. Scoc716

Can someone explain to me why episode 22, season 4 and episode 1, season 5 are both listed as overall episode 92? Episode 1, season 5 should be listed as overall episode 93? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irelandjnr (talk • contribs) 18:15, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use removal

The use of images not in compliance with our fair-use criteria or our policy on nonfree content is not appropriate, and the images have been removed. Please do not restore them. -M^ask? 00:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Episode notability

All of the episodes of this series fail the notability guidelines for television episodes. The way for these articles to be improved is through the inclusion of real-world information from reliable sources to assert notability. That is unlikely to happen, and these only have certain bad aspects (though all may not apply) like containing overly long or one sentence plot summaries, trivia, and quotes. Per that, they need to be a small part of this list.

If there are no objections, these will be redirected soon. Otherwise, discussion will take place here. Please remember that this is not a vote. If you like the information, that's fine and dandy, but your opinion doesn't really count towards anything. The only opinions that do count are ones that that lean towards the inclusion of real world information. TTN 20:30, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Against merging them - see Smallville (TV series). _{El Greco}^(talk) 00:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about it? Do you want to actually place summaries and real world information into the season articles so they are not just copies of this page? TTN 00:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It has Smallville (season x) pages, as does The Simpsons, and other tv show pages. I don't see why the pages have to be merged, they are talking about each season of the series, where as the List of ____ episodes is just a list. And yes, there will be episode summaries and information added to these pages. _{El Greco}^(talk) 00:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it won't hurt to leave the season pages for now. You aren't against the episodes being merged, right? TTN 00:49, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they do have episode summaries and include everything relevant to the series/episode. Let alone 99% of all the episodes are just season 1 (2 are from season 2, and one is from season 4 if I'm not mistaken). I don't think that's a big deal (it's not like there is a episode page for all 111 episodes). Some cleanup and sourcing of them could be done. So, in other words I'm against the episode pages being merged. But here's my question, if episode pages are such a big deal, why is there a template for them? {{Infobox television episode}}, and the countless others for each individual show. _{El Greco}^(talk) 01:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please look over WP:EPISODE for what belongs in an episode article. Episode articles are being cut back on currently, so that is irrelevant. TTN 01:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting...

All of the episodes listed as hyperlinks here seem to redirect back to the list of episodes. Is there a reason for this? I'm going to attempt a few episode article creations later tonight (when I get to work - woohoo!) and see how it goes. BubbaStrangelove (talk) 02:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]