Talk:List of Ligapokal matches

	Association football portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
	This redirect is supported by the German football task force.

Germany

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles

Split

This article should be split into separate articles for each Ligapokal season. This article has no context, making it fairly useless, and it also hardly complies with any style conventions for football articles. – Pee Jay 10:56, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From a purely pragmatic viewpoint I think it doesn't make sense to split this article. A split would probably lead to a deletion of the new articles or at best to a new batch of stubs nearly devoid of useful information. At the moment it is probably best to leave the article as they are. Give the article time to accumulate information (at the moment nobody seems interested to contribute anyway) and split it later. Also the pages that will eventually be targets for the split should be marked as redirect (to this article) with the possibility of becoming an article. OdinFK (talk) 14:05, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well certainly the article needs sorting out in a major way. It doesn't even have a lead! – Pee Jay 01:34, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A split would make sense if there was ample information here about each tournament. However, this article is just a stub. Why split a stub into 10 more stubs? JohnnyPolo24 (talk) 03:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Someone should do the necessary research to create 10 not-stubs then. – Pee Jay 23:19, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]