Talk:List of Lepidoptera of New Zealand

This article is written in New Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse, centre, fiord) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lepidoptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lepidoptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of butterflies and moths on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LepidopteraWikipedia:WikiProject LepidopteraTemplate:WikiProject LepidopteraLepidoptera articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Common names

Adding the common names to this list would be more than a little useful... Grutness...wha? 08:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well: feel free to do so! Ruigeroeland (talk) 09:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If I knew what the common names were I would have. In the end I had to check 40 links on this page to find the moth I was looking for! It's a task for someone who knows about moths - not for someone who's simply trying to find a specific moth. Yet it's people who are trying to find a specific moth who are disadvantaged by the lack of this specific information. I've filled in a few, but most of the articles don't list the common names 9and a lot of the articles have dead links as their only references). This is work for someone who knows moths. Grutness...wha? 00:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I've added all I can from the individual article pages. But not it will need someone who actually knows about moths to double-check which common name is known for these moths in New Zealand and also to add in any other common names. That is not a job for someone who knows very little about moths - it requires a lepidopterist. Grutness...wha? 01:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome job! I have no source for common names at this time I'm afraid. I think the approach you used is the only way to go at this moment. At this time, I am working on African butterflies, but I will help out making new species pages later on, and will add common names as I move along. Cheers and thanks for the work! Ruigeroeland (talk) 10:41, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Argyresthia eugeniella

I can't find any supporting citation to suggest that this species is in New Zealand. The wikipedia article relating to this species relied on two citations that actually referred to the species Coscinoptycha improbana Meyrick 1881. Both species are known by the common name "Guava Moth" and this may have lead to the confusion. I've checked the Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd site as well as searched for supporting literature in Google scholar but can't find any mention of Argyresthia eugeniella being present in New Zealand. I've therefore edited the Argyresthia eugeniella article and would suggest that unless other Editors have more luck than me, this species be removed from this list.Ambrosia10 (talk) 06:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect you are right. If there's no objection after a couple of days, go ahead and remove it. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 06:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have removed Argyresthia eugeniella (guava moth) Busck, 1917 from the list but if any editors believe this is in error please feel free to revert this edit. --Ambrosia10 (talk) 18:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Lepidoptera of New Zealand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091101204824/http://www.monarch.org.nz/monarch/ to http://www.monarch.org.nz/monarch/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:16, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]