Talk:List of Lactarius species
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Error
[edit]The species Lactarius pyrogalus is duplicated. Dr. Lenaldo Vigo (talk) 19:45, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- I've removed one. Thanks for your comment. J Milburn (talk) 20:13, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Another Lactarius species
[edit]It's Lactarius fuliginellus. See source. Dr. Lenaldo Vigo (talk) 20:55, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I added it. There's a running count of species hidden in a note at the beginning of the article; we're currently at 313, so there's still a ways to go to get to the ~450 total suggested by the Dictionary of the Fungi. Sasata (talk) 22:14, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
A bunch of photos were renamed
[edit]A bunch of photos were renamed as someone disagreed with their identification. The illustrations in the table may have to be amended. --Tony Wills (talk) 09:58, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Lactarius species. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716083053/http://www.fungi4schools.org/Reprints/ENGLISH_NAMES.pdf to http://www.fungi4schools.org/Reprints/ENGLISH_NAMES.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:28, 26 December 2017 (UTC)