Talk:List of Islamic apologetic works

This page was proposed for deletion by Discospinster (talk · contribs) on 18 December 2019.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Bibliographies

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Islam

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Scope of the list

@The revealer: I thought it would be best to respond here to your question at User talk:Discospinster#Bibliography of books defending Islam – I hope that's okay. I think the list should be limited to books which are primarily concerned with defending Islam, yes. Otherwise I imagine it could become quite unwieldy, and could be very difficult to delineate what constitutes a defence – presumably even books critical of Islam have some nice things to say about it. On the other hand, looking at the current list, there don't seem to be very many that would remain if the scope were to be narrower. As such, it may still be the case that deleting the list would be the best solution. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll remove the books which don't have defending Islam as a primary objective. But I think those books which have defending Islam as a primary objective but not a Wikipedia article, should be kept (if the page itself is kept, though). Isn't the author having a Wikipedia page enough? I mean, if the author is notable enough to be in Wikipedia, then his/her book must be notable enough too (unless he/she has many many books).The revealer (talk) 03:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notability doesn't automatically carry over from authors to their works (as WP:NINI puts it, "notability of a parent entity or topic ... does not always imply the notability of the subordinate entities"), but including books that meet the notability criteria for books but which don't yet have an article in the list seems reasonable. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 12:00, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]