Talk:List of ICD-10 codes

I'm considering deleting the 'appendices' section as it doesn't seem to relate to the subject, rather to the American edition of a publication. I have the international edition of ICD10 volume 3 in front of me (ISBN 3241544198) and it has 10 sections and no appendices at all. Any ideas whether to internationalise this, or just stick to the subject? Claus Diff 12:43, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Claus -

thanks for the great work! I am not an expert of ICD codes ... But I see a big diffrence beteen ICD-9 and ICD-10. Is it appropriate to inlcude a section that describes how and why the changes came about?

206.107.211.5 20:40, 27 September 2006 (UTC)William Halverson[reply]

Mergefrom ICD-10

ICD-10 seems to be a replica of this page, except its links don't go through. I recommend merging it into this page, which is more developed. HoCkEy PUCK 01:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse merge (repost from discussion on ICD-10) - I agree that the content is much better on the page List_of_ICD-10_codes and its subpages, but ICD-10 is the more obvious title. Since the subject itself is a list, I think it would be fine to have one page with a short intro paragraph that explains what ICD-10 is, than go ahead and provide the codes, without needing to have "List of" in the title. -Rustavo^{Talk/Contribs} 19:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merged

I merged it. I'll set this page as a redirect. SadanYagci 21:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]