Talk:List of Fast N' Loud episodes

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of Fast N' Loud episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on List of Fast N' Loud episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Split

UNDO SPLIT (MERGE)

There is consensus that the content is better off presented together in a single article (flow, context, verifiability, notability). The reason in support of splitting, that it is 100KB and getting bigger (or would be when merged again), does not come from a bright-line rule (there are always additional considerations). There are many articles, including featured ones, larger than 100 KB, and (assuming the number was taken from WP:Articlesize) do note that the 100KB limit is suggested for article prose, not the size of wiki markup. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:22, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Support split - This page is now over 100 kB, and should be split to new articles such as Fast N' Loud (season 1), Fast N' Loud (season 2) and Fast N' Loud (season 3). Thoughts? --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:18, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever split the article into the various season articles sure did a bad job at it. They couldn't even clean it up properly. Might want to rethink splitting article if one is unwilling to put in the work. Best to leave it be. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:14, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - @Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars:, the split looks just fine to me. --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:51, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

More than have of them don’t have proper level headings. They should also provide info about the season with multiple reliable sources, not just the list of episodes from that season. You should look at examples of how other shows have their seasons vs. episode lists set up. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 02:22, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm requesting a reverse split to merge all the poorly put together episode lists by season into one page where it will flow better for readers regardless of page size. Individually, they offer little context and there was zero effort to improve the season lists. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose reverse split - I oppose the reverse split, as the combined file size is over 100 kB and growing rapidly. --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Except, it's not growing rapidly. It went up only 10K over the last couple of years. Some clean up of the formatting would reduce it a lot. There's no need to split unless you can do something like List of Grey's Anatomy episodes for a full list (~40K) and individual season summaries like Grey's Anatomy (season 13) (which that may even be a bit too large for you at 85K). Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:59, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - Be bold. If the file size can be reduced, this should have been done by now. If an article is over 100 kB, it should probably be split, which no one opposed until months after it was split. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. I know you hate to do any more work that you need to do, but if you split articles in the future, you should read WP:PROPERSPLIT. It's always better to be a productive member of this encyclopedia, but for some reason you expect others to do more work than you are willing to do yourself. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:27, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose split - the articles for individual seasons don't seem to pass WP:GNG, where is the independent coverage? Most of the sources are just ratings articles. They don't deserve to exist as individual articles, at present. starship .paint (talk) 07:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Jax 0677 and Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: - I've requested further input from WT:TV. starship .paint (talk) 13:03, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This proposal has become muddled. But I support eliminating the "season" articles", and merging them to a 'List of episodes' article. There is definitely not enough content to support individual "season" articles. I'd rather have a "long" LoE article, than a bunch of "season" articles that don't meet notability. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:45, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.