Talk:List of Extreme Makeover: Home Edition specials
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 16 January 2019
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved as requested; merging is outside the scope of this close, so please feel free to pursue that as necessary. Dekimasuよ! 08:13, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Extreme Makeover: Home Edition (Specials) → List of Extreme Makeover: Home Edition specials – It’s an episode list, the parentheticals are unnecessary and the capitalization for “Specials” doesn’t make sense. Fradio71 (talk) 06:35, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support, but better solution would be to merge with List of Extreme Makeover: Home Edition episodes. This isn't a "season" page and the specials have no relation to each other. --Gonnym (talk) 09:03, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah that did strike me a bit weird. It's not like there were so many it became a size issue. My guess is that at the show's peak it was so big that people thought the specials deserved their own special place. I'm gonna go check if the table is already present on the list of episodes page.--Fradio71 (talk) 16:29, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Update: Yeah it's there, so all the new stuff would be the table structure (on the episode's page it's kind of like a projection of what is here and not a true duplication, and the episode summaries, which wouldn't feel right to lose. Maybe merger is the better option?--Fradio71 (talk) 16:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- It's ok to mix tables with episode summaries with those that don't. Look at other list articles like Simpsons or Futurama. A merge would definitely be a better option. --Gonnym (talk) 18:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Alright I added the template, or at least tried to. On mobile, the only types of templates that are visible are infoboxes. On an Amazon Fire Silk browser there's no way to get to the desktop site, because when you press it you get a zoomed out mobile site. Sigh--Fradio71 (talk) 19:02, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- It's ok to mix tables with episode summaries with those that don't. Look at other list articles like Simpsons or Futurama. A merge would definitely be a better option. --Gonnym (talk) 18:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Update: Yeah it's there, so all the new stuff would be the table structure (on the episode's page it's kind of like a projection of what is here and not a true duplication, and the episode summaries, which wouldn't feel right to lose. Maybe merger is the better option?--Fradio71 (talk) 16:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah that did strike me a bit weird. It's not like there were so many it became a size issue. My guess is that at the show's peak it was so big that people thought the specials deserved their own special place. I'm gonna go check if the table is already present on the list of episodes page.--Fradio71 (talk) 16:29, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Is the page even necessary?
[edit]It seems as if the small table seen here is exactly as coded in the episodes page, though I could’ve sworn here it was more detailed. Maybe I’ve looked away too long. Thoughts?--Fradio71 (talk) 08:22, 26 January 2019 (UTC)