Talk:List of Exalted publications

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Role-playing games Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Author credits!

I added a few author credits, those I have right on hand. These should be included! I hope to add more later, but feel free, anybody who has the information, to add proper credits yourself. Artemis-Arethusa 00:57, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've put all the author credits in. Some authors (on Amazon, my source of information on these) were only identified as "White Wolf Publishing", which I feel is unsatisfactory. If anyone has information on the actual human beings who wrote these books, please correct the information. Artemis-Arethusa 19:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I have fixed links so they don't go to the wrong people with the same name. Artemis-Arethusa 19:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Online products

Should we include online products such as Glories of the Most High and the SAS adventure modules? If so, should this article be renamed to something like "list of Exalted publications" or "list of Exalted products"? -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 06:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Updates

Isn't the thousand correct actions a print book now? I don't actually know, since I don't own it. Can someone confirm? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.228.205.247 (talk) 01:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. This decision is over the page move only and does not address the questions about this needing to be an article or how exalted should appear. The latter point would need to be resolved with a page move of the main article. Vegaswikian (talk) 17:50, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Exalted sourcebooks → list of Exalted publications — Expand scope to cover works which are related to the Exalted game line but don't meet the definition of sourcebook, such as comics, board games and comics.Relisted. Fences&Windows 22:15, 30 June 2010 (UTC) -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 07:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IMO this page should be renamed to list of Exalted publications to include things such as ebooks, online articles, novels and comics. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 06:10, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the move tag. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 06:16, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I accidentally used {{subst|move|current page name|proposed new page name}} instead of {{subst:move|proposed new page name}}. I've fixed the move tag. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 07:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Is this an appropriate article at all? Please read Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists. Fences&Windows 22:15, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment both titles are horrible. It implies that these sourcebooks or publications should be exalted ("exalted" is an English word; and I don't particularly want to exalt these things) 76.66.195.196 (talk) 04:47, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.