This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
I am not convinced by this list and its sources. Isn't it redundant, incomplete and deceptive? Is it original research? -- Checco (talk) 20:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think its redundant since there are many parties who do advocate for the transformation of the EU into a federal entity, a "United States of Europe", or a "European superstrate". It's important to remember that not all political parties which are "Pro-EU" would also be "Pro-Federalist". Some advocate for the status quo, others for reform or perhaps greater integration, but not all advocate for total federalism. This is unique. I don't believe this list to be OR as (for example Volt Europa) does advocate for the EU to transform into a single borderless Federation. It's well sourced in its respective article. As for the incompleteness, the article was created a few days ago...it can be expanded and refs added. Archives908 (talk) 20:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]