Talk:List of England One Day International cricket records
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
This page was a red category on the England Cricket Team page. It seemed a glaring omission so I clicked on the link and started to put some information in, starting with a table for the highest scores. This was flagged for deletion before I'd had chance to save it. Perhaps we might be given just a few minutes grace to do a page? Such summary executions are such a waste of time and it puts people off creating anything. Nick mallory 08:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC) I agree with Nick Mallory. This article was red linked and would totally disagree with it being put up for deleation. The article now since it Nick created it is not very short as is mentioned as the reason why it is being deleated so overall I believe that this article should stay because it is important enough to have an article and the fact it is long enough to stay also 02blythed 08:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of England One Day International cricket records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161123210930/http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/team/results_summary.html?class=2%3Bid%3D1%3Btype%3Dteam to http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/team/results_summary.html?class=2%3Bid%3D1%3Btype%3Dteam
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160817013517/http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/bowling/most_wickets_career.html?class=2%3Bid%3D1%3Btype%3Dteam to http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/bowling/most_wickets_career.html?class=2%3Bid%3D1%3Btype%3Dteam
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
live blogging
[edit]There is no need to update innings as they are in progress.
qualifier for bowling figures
[edit]I'm sure I've raised this elsewhere, but the qualifiers for bowling average and strike rate should be based on wickets, not balls bowled. Howstat uses 50 wickets, and cricinfo use a lower number of balls (1000) for their overall records than they do on the England team records (England strike rate, Global strike rate) and the top-6 on overall page don't appear on team lists (or at least they don't for full-member nations). Spike 'em (talk) 12:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Rowspans
[edit]I find rowspans that merge cells that are in different sections earlier in the table look really confusing and am going to revert most of today's changes, as I have done in the past. Just because you can do something doesn't mean that you should. Spike 'em (talk) 13:39, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- And I've seen it mentioned that it messes up e-readers too. Spike 'em (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2023 (UTC)