Jump to content

Talk:List of Copts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Muslim Converts as Prominent copts!

[edit]

There are few names of muslim convert to Christianity from Egypt who were added to the "prominent copts" which I don't know why? Queen nazly and Magdi allam converted to Roman Catholicism not even coptic catholicism and they did that after leaving egypt. Mohammed hegazy is just a guy who practiced his basic right of choosing his own faith. I don't know why he is prominent? Frankly I'm intimidated by that, as if don't have prominent copts and we are just padding the list or as if we are scoring points against muslims!! so immature! we are much better than that —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coptic ray (talk • contribs) 03:12, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I see what you mean. We should definitely get rid of the guys are Roman Catholics and not Coptic Catholics. And, even then, the Catholic Copts are really only ethnic "Copts". In a religious context, they are technically not "Coptic" as that would usually just refer to the Orthodox; as well, the Catholic and Protestant Egyptians—especially the latter—have abandoned a lot of the customs in the Coptic Church, thus being one of the reasons that distuingish them from the Copts. Even while there is not a lot of them, the "Coptic" Evangelicals and other Egyptian Protestants have converted few people, and quite surprisingly, a lot of them were Muslims—not even Copts to begin with. There needs to be a way to properly differentiate between "Roman Catholic" converts, "Coptic" Catholics and "Egyptian" Protestants in a way that doesn't confuse the identities. ~ Troy (talk) 19:45, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that we should remove those who are not Copts. Copts are, in fact, are not Arabs, they are their own group. I am going to remove the Muslims-turned-Christian people because they are not Copts, they are Arabs, and they don't follow the neither of the 2 Coptic denominations. Have any problems. Lehoiberri (talk) 04:35, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image Image:Boutros Boutros-Ghali.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any updates on this? Has Boutros-Ghali complained over unauthorized use of his image? Mwahcysl (talk) 12:13, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No reply? No proof that permission has been given for the image to hold? 48 hours and I will take it down unless solid, court-ordered proof is given that the image can be shown here. Mwahcysl (talk) 21:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

This list has too many redlinks. It does not appear to be a notable list per se. It therefore must be justified as a navigational aid, meaning that the majority of linked names are blue links (linking to an article or a section of an article) or are links to articles that someone intends to create. This means in effect that every individual entry must be independently notable. A directory of all Copts is not allowed. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:15, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:CoptsCollage.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:CoptsCollage.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:CoptsCollage.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:30, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Metropolitan Seraphim of Glastonbury

[edit]

I removed Metropolitan Seraphim of Glastonbury from the list as he is not an ethnic Egyptian Copt. Further, his diocese is no longer in communion with the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchate. -Anon

Orphaned references in List of Copts

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of Copts's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "multiple":

  • From Matta El Meskeen: "English Keraza — Pope Shenouda's explanation on why Fr. Matta was not accepted as Pope — see Page 6" (PDF). Retrieved 2012-09-02.
  • From Copts in Libya: Looklex Encyclopedia: 1% of Libya's population (6 million), or 60,000 people in Libya, adhere to the Coptic Orthodox faith
  • From Copts: Tore Kjeilen. "Coptic Church - LookLex Encyclopaedia".

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:15, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on List of Copts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Copts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:25, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Copts&oldid=1208224634"