Jump to content

Talk:List of Cliff Richard television appearances

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move to new title

[edit]

This isn't a draft list of Cliff Richard television appearances. It's a draft list of Cliff Richard BBC television appearances only. 72.245.246.219 (talk) 23:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Duly noted. Add other television appearances. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:08, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I just added a heading. If you feel this needs to be moved, please state that clearly. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confused title

[edit]

As posted earlier, this page seems to be confusingly titled. It is a detailed list of series and specials broadcast by the BBC starring Cliff Richard. It's not a list of TV appearances by Cliff. There's nothing from all his ITV output and indeed nothing at all of his other BBC work outside of his series and specials. I suppose it could grow into a comprehensive list, but I still think it's mistitled.62.253.196.107 (talk) 16:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This article should not be using BBC Genome listings descriptions verbatim. --McGeddon (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent copypasted content has been removed. The remainder is unhelpful commentary.--Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
I was waiting to see how long it would be before McGeddon/Gorlitz found a way to delete this data. Looks like they've come up with a plan. 62.253.196.107 (talk) 16:15, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Simply rewriting copypasted BBC-listings text (eg. "the whole show guarantees plenty of 'Good rockin' tonight'!") is all that's needed here. --McGeddon (talk) 16:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Let's allow an uninvolved editor decide if it should or should not be deleted. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dammit! All the copyright material has been removed. How can the page be deleted now? And the next reason thought up by McGeddon Görlitz is.... drum roll.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.253.196.107 (talk) 12:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing the copypasted content. --McGeddon (talk) 13:00, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You could have done it yourself. But that would have spoilt your petulant plans. Sorry about that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.253.196.107 (talk) 13:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I could have done. You'll find that bad-faith accusations and personal attacks generally discourage people from helping you out, though. --McGeddon (talk) 13:27, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can't see anything that indicates help was requested.62.253.196.107 (talk) 13:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for doing this regardless of your attitude or smug sense of superiority. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Personal attacks are so unpleasant and create a bad faith atmosphere on wikipedia. I am surprised McGeddon Görlitz continues in this manner whilst criticising others. A warning should be posted on their talk pages, but what would be the point? It would be deleted and threats against this editor would be made in retaliation.62.253.196.107 (talk) 14:58, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry you feel that calling you out for your bad attitude is a personal attack or an bad faith. I will ignore the rest of your libelous rant. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:25, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing libelous appears on this page. 62.253.196.107 (talk) 16:34, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]