Talk:List of Blue Mountains subjects
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 10 November 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Blue Mountains list
[edit]I created this list so people can see all the BM articles at their fingertips. If you know of any more, please put them on or let me know.
Sardaka (talk) 10:11, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- would this be easier to maintain with categories on subjects rather than a list of items ? Dave Rave (talk) 06:47, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Page move...
[edit]Why is this "Guide to the Blue Mountains"? Against wikipedia convention - and without discussion. The expression "no idea" comes to mind. This should be restored immediately. --Merbabu (talk) 09:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Possible Wikiproject
[edit]Could this possibly be something that starts the Blue Mountains wikiproject. I for one would love one, and contribute heavily. De Mattia (talk) 06:10, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- How about a Portal dedicated to Blue Mountains topics with selected articles and photos that automatically rotate.This list could be incorporated into the portal or even used for info. Here is an example of a portal 1. I think a portal for the Blue Mountains would look much nicer though. Adam (talk) 08:15, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Why do we need a project? There is a Sydney project that gets almost no attention. Given that there are so few editors, the amount of time and effort to set up and maintain project bureaucracy could be much better spent just getting on and improving the articles. --Merbabu (talk) 08:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- I was just having a second look at this article and noticed that it was pretty much the same as a category. The category seems a lot easier to navigate though. Should this article be nominated for deletion once again. I would be in favour of this. ***Adam*** 22:41, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- Why do we need a project? There is a Sydney project that gets almost no attention. Given that there are so few editors, the amount of time and effort to set up and maintain project bureaucracy could be much better spent just getting on and improving the articles. --Merbabu (talk) 08:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)