Talk:List of Bengali films of 2012

India: West Bengal / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 17:22, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

– Per WP:NCLIST. Note that this is a sample nomination, extracted from a set of over 850 such lists in Category:Lists of films by year and its subcategories. Further details in the extended rationale below. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Extended rationale: I have placed the full list at User:BrownHairedGirl/Film lists for renaming. I selected the 2012 lists as the sample, because the current lists seemed to me to be most likely to watched by active editors.
Per WP:NCLIST, "Standard practice is to entitle list articles as List of ___ (for example list of Xs)". Each of these articles consists of list of films, so there is no reason for them to depart from the convention.

In each case, it would be possible to write an encyclopedic article "Fooish films of 2012" which is not a list, setting out trends, describing themes explored and cinematographic styles, and comparing critical reactions, box-office data, etc. Using the "List of Xs" format makes it clear to both readers and editors what these pages contain.

Note that some sets under Category:Lists of films by country by year have been named with the "lists of" prefix for some time, such as Category:Lists of American films by year and Category:Lists of Canadian films by year. Some others such as those in Category:Lists of Turkish films by year, have been manually renamed by me over last month, without controversy.

So far, the only reason I can see to oppose these renamings would be:

concerns about the sorting of the lists in categories. However, I have already been through all of these lists with AWB to standardise the categorisation, and in each case have added the appropriate sort keys so that they will sort correctly when renamed. If I have missed any, I will fix them after the move.
Most of these lists are linked through a series of templates, which will need updating afterwards. I undertake to do that if the page moves proceed.

There may of course be other concerns that I have not foreseen. I will notify the relevant Wikiprojects. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My recommendation is to keep the names shorter. Instead of adding an s we prefix List of and add an s, so we use List of Tamal films, for example. But by adding "of 2010", we create a WP:SETINDEX, and List of is superfluous. Apteva (talk) 17:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
None of these pages is a set index. "A set index article is a list article about a set of items of a specific type that share the same (or similar) name", but the films in these lists do not share a similar name. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:15, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the similar discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Bollywood_films_of_XXXX. The thought is to call them for example "2012 in Bollywood" in a similar manner as the already existing 2012 in film. More content could be added so that it is not just a list. BollyJeff | talk 19:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Quite an ambitious effort, and I think one worth exploring. I am all for anything that improves consistency across naming conventions on Wikipedia. My concern: whoever changes the titles should ALSO make sure that all of the affected articles are classified as "List-Class" on the corresponding talk pages. Fortdj33 (talk) 19:36, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Many of them are already classified that way in the relevant project banners. However, if the page moves proceed, then that should of course be done for all of them. It;s the sort of task which a bot could do quite easily, so if the moves are implemented I will make a request at WP:BOTREQ. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:10, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - if we're doing it already, then let's be consistent. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support: for consistency with other similar articles per WP:CRITERIA of article titles.--Michaela den (talk) 19:33, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support: It has been moved already. Can some admin please close this discussion?--GDibyendu (talk) 15:54, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

'Note: the hundreds of other pages in the list at User:BrownHairedGirl/Film lists for renaming were moved by a bot, following a request at WP:BOTREQ. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:25, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of Bengali films of 2013 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:00, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Bengali films of 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131105013153/http://www.theindependentbd.com/international/asia/99825-himanish-goswami-passes-away.html to http://www.theindependentbd.com/international/asia/99825-himanish-goswami-passes-away.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]