Talk:List of Amanita species

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Amanita species article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Fungi Mid‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A. rubescens?

A valid species? Also: strangulata? Said: Rursus ☻ 10:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dangerous icons!

The icon for poisonous should definitely NOT be green! On a small screen you don't see the sad mouth... I'll change it to a less "friendly" color. --Janke | Talk 10:26, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Super Mario

Mario and Luigi kills broomrape and rapes bowser--Zakawer (talk) 17:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Childish icons

Is this list just for mushroom eaters? - Assuming "no" for an answer here, I'd say that they are misplaced here and just look childish.--Natr (talk) 20:57, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't ask in a particularly collegial way, but I replaced them with the icons from the mycomorphbox. This should be done at the other list pages too if you feel like helping with that. de Bivort 21:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Amanita species. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060924211409/http://www.plantlife.org.uk/uk/assets/saving-species/saving-species-publications/recommended-english-names-for-fungi.pdf to http://www.plantlife.org.uk/uk/assets/saving-species/saving-species-publications/recommended-english-names-for-fungi.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edibility indicators

I'm surprised to run across the edibility indicators, as displayed at present (apparently from the howEdible field of the mycomorphbox), for a few reasons:

there is no legend given, so the reader is left to guess what they mean
it's not obvious how the choice of indicator, which appears to lack any direct citation (to evidence), is kept in sync with any (well-sourced, presumably) changes that might occur in sub-pages
the implications and interpretation of these indicators are not simple - and the lack of linkage to reliable sources seems risky

It's a nice list, but these edibility cartoons seem quite dubious to me, as implemented here. — soupvector (talk) 00:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]