Talk:List of ARM Cortex-M development tools

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 January 2024. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of ARM Cortex-M development tools. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:46, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prospective changes in the development tools section

ST Micro purchased Atollic True Studio about 2 years ago^[1] and made it free for all STM32 development. After a few updated releases of True Studio, they deprecated it in favor of a new Eclipse based IDE package, "STMCubeIDE"; it currently lacks a few of the features of TrueSTUDIO, and the latter is still available for download.

In addition, for software development of on the Microsemi FPGAs with soft and hard Cortex-M and.or RISC-V cores, Microsmi offers their own Eclipse based IDE package called "SoftConsole" (originally from Avaya, then acquired by Actel, which became part of Microsemi, which was purchased by Mircochip. I don't find the press release for the changes in ownership at the moment, so no citation for that.)

I think that both should be added to the list of development tools. Filker0 (talk) 23:35, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.st.com/content/st_com/en/about/media-center/press-item.html/c2839.html

Sourcing proposal

I've !voted 'keep' at the AfD where one of the deletion arguments was that the lists are original research and, while I won't consider this article original research (because of substantial overlap of the entries listed with similar lists in the published secondary sources I found), some threshold for referencing in the spirit of Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability/Archive_63#RfC:_Are_.22in_popular_culture.22_entries_.22self-sourcing.22_or_do_they_require_a_reference_under_Wikipedia:Verifiability_and_Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources.3F IMO would be useful.

WP:PST mandates that Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources and the current practice of referencing vendor websites can give the wrong impression that this requirement can't be met. PaulT2022 (talk) 16:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.st.com/content/st_com/en/about/media-center/press-item.html/c2839.html

[1]