Talk:Liskom

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Russia: Technology & engineering / Economy Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the economy of Russia task force.

Companies Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Stub This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Please, don't delete this page! Discussion is here and here.

JohnVla (talk) 14:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have been monitoring the construction of this article, originally nominated by me for deletion, has been recreated with substantial information. Please comment on my or User talk:JohnVla's page if you believe this article meets the criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks! Cliffsteinman (talk) 19:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably better to keep the discussion here rather than on individual Talk Pages. That way, other editors can review the discussion more easily.

This article no longer meets the criteria for speedy deletion (assertion of notability has been made). However, that assertion does not appear to be backed up by a reliable source. Thus, the article could still be subject to deletion via the WP:AFD process because it looks like advertising. I'm not itching to delete it at the moment but you should fix this issue soon because others may come along at anytime and nominate the article for deletion via AFD. --Richard (talk) 16:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article looks pretty neutral. I don't see any blatant opinions or anything, this user is Russian and may not be able to express something in a particular way and thus I has been helping best I can. Is there a section that appears too much like an ad? I informed him that it would need some history and product information and he included it, no longer a danger for CSD being short but advertisment...hmm I'll look over it again but please tell me what looks ad like. Thanks. Cliffsteinman (talk) 07:56, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Also a good bit of wording has been changed by me, who has no ties to the company or Russia. Or any interest in promoting a competitor of American Xerox :D Cliffsteinman (talk) 07:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Liskom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Liskom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]