Jump to content

Talk:Lisa the Beauty Queen/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Congratulations! Lisa the Beauty Queen has met all the criteria to become a good article. Thanks to all who contributed! I will leave the updating of the talk page templates to the top contributor. Limetolime talk to me look what I did! 20:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at Lisa the Skeptic. It is a featured article, and if users use this as a guide, Lisa the Beauty Queen will become an FA in no time! Limetolime talk to me look what I did! 00:23, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]