Talk:Lisa Sauermann
This article was nominated for deletion on 17 May 2013. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why does this article exist? Evidence why it shouldn't: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Iurie_Boreico http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Peter_Scholze http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Darij_Grinberg etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.75.46.166 (talk) 11:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- In November 2014 she uploaded her first paper on arXiv: "On the μ-admissible set in the extended affine Weyl groups of E6 and E7", which is about a question proposed by R. Kottwitz and M. Rapoport in 2000.[6]
- I actually came here looking for information on Lisa Sauermann, after watching a video on a mathematical problem where she is mentioned: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M64HUIJFTZM — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.76.114.205 (talk) 18:20, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
I think this sentence is really irrelevant and should be deleted. Wikipedia is not a news ticker for papers uploaded to arxiv; note that arxiv uploads are not subject to refereeing (although there is some minimal quality control). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.220.132.179 (talk) 12:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
This feels like a somewhat irrelevant article. She is good, but has at this point done nothing to merit a Wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.225.98.205 (talk) 13:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
I feel that a biography of an up-and-coming mathematician should not start with information about what she did in high school. Rather, I think the article should start with the most important things she has done so far. However, not being versed in the lore of Wikipedia, I was loath to jump in there and start re-ordering things. Is there a "correct" way to do this kind of thing? or to propose a change rather than just make it directly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.42.84.125 (talk) 07:19, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Women scientists articles
- Unknown-importance Women scientists articles
- WikiProject Women scientists articles