This article was nominated for deletion on 13 February 2021. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
to assume that you determine her notability to stem from the million-dollar-grant? I don't find anything that makes her pass the objective NPROF criterion and her citation-profile is unimpressive. This is quite an old article; do you still believe that she deserves a page per our guidelines? How many CAREER awards are allotted each year, (which is perhaps the most relevant question)? AFAIR, it was somewhere around 300-400 in the initial years (mid-90s, I guess) and then increased by quite much; no clue about current rates. ∯WBGconverse15:35, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An NSF career award does not confer notability. If that is what notability is based on here, this article needs to be reviewed to see if any other indicator of notability can be found. Natureium (talk) 18:16, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
H-index of 11 is low in these fields. And, apart from the Career Grant, there's nothing else.
At any case, I am not risking a deletion-nomination. Every AfD is being broadcast over Twitter with flooding by semi-dormant accounts; making them travesties of a discussion. And, people who seems to be quite adored by the upper echelons of WIR have been making random accusations about some conspiracy on our part to leave male bios in order to promote misogyny. ∯WBGconverse21:15, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that this page could use some work, but I think that she is notable - for the grant, for routinely being the only black woman in her school/ department and for inventing a new technique. Unfortunately, as with most women scientists, there is little written about her beyond her faculty page. Hopefully we can leave the notability tag on and people will add content, and if they don't I will try to later in the week.
Unless I am missing something, the AfDs aren't being broadcast over twitter - Tuttle noticed and shared the link to her own page. Jesswade88 (talk) 08:09, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The number of grants allotted per year are way too many to confer notability and I disagree about being the only black woman in her college; as an indicator of notability. Essentially this idea that you deserve an article just because you are the first person of a specific background to do a very specific thing at a very specific place at a specific time is taking things to the extreme.
As to in vivo-FPOP, that's definitely a quite good point (FWIW, the correct citation will be [doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01888 this paper], not the one that currently stands), though I have no clue as to the significance of the discovery. I note that the citation count stands at 26, which is not too convincing.
I'm working on this page as part of the 500 Women Wiki Scientists project. My current plans are to find a photo to add, split up the career section to focus separately on training and current work, and add a publications list. UWM.AP.Endo (talk) 06:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
