This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
I have first hand information that Lisa Chambers is not related to Frank Chambers, or for that matter Jack Chambers. The Irish Times article is incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnflan (talk • contribs) 00:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You might be able to dig up a source that confirms that? Either a correction in the Irish Times or an item in a local Mayo newspaper might plausibly say so. jnestorius(talk)10:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We've had four months of various IPs' and user:SunnyRain25's attempts to remove apparently well-sourced material, claiming it is "false" or "inaccurate", or with no explanation at all. The removals have been reverted by me, user:Spleodrach, user:89.100.0.144, user:Pax85, user:Blaze Wolf. and user:Discospinster. Simply being controversial or negative does not make information inaccurate or false. and is not a reason to keep sourced information out of an article. If there is a problem with the information, or the sources being used, or the neutrality of our coverage please explain. Meters (talk) 20:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]