Talk:Linklog

roll/log

Isn't this really a "link roll"? That is what http://del.icio.us/help refers to them as. I'll clarify and make a redirect from "link roll" to this soon if there's no discussion, though I think "r_Linklog - jdsiouewkrñ.f,msdjkcg<<zl.nrfetSólo enlaces oll" should eventually be the primary title. - Fcendejas 18:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Generally a collection of links attached to a regular blog is a link roll (or more commonly a blogroll) -- a blog which consists primarily or entirely of links to other stuff is a linkblog. Not that I have any citations whatsoever to back that up, but that seems to be the most common usage of the terms IMO. -- anonymous user who doesn't have an account 6 Dec 2006

How about some samples, or examples, of Linklogs. I think we're talking about something that is not a part of another thing, in this case a blog, but a stand-alone Linklog, or at least something that is pretty close to something that stands alone. If, however, a linklog is in fact a link roll, blogroll, or some other standard part of a blog, this term should be retired. Personally, I am not aware of any link only blogs, but I'd love to discover some. --TMH 23:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Well, here's popular Scoble's LinkBlog http://www.google.com/reader/shared/14480565058256660224 --Not Logged In user yuvipanda

The term linklog appears to broader. Link roll is probably just a more modern slag for linklog. Please review the references I just added to the article which trace the term back to PBX systems back as far as 1993. Further research could likely produce older references to the term. David Condrey ^{log talk} 07:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Linklog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070629133618/http://sourceforge.net/projects/linkwalla/ to http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/linkwalla

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:39, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

"Linked list"

@David Condrey: can you defend your edits here? I think you're taking a few un-related places where the words "Link" and "Log" appear next to each other, and claiming they're related. The article (for most of its history) described a linklog as a blog with links, which appears to have minimal (but some) usage. The definition you give feels completely fake. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Split page and disambiguate two different subjects: linkblog user feature, link log CS construct

This article does a poor job of attempting to document two very different meanings for "linklog" which have nothing to do with each other and make the page confusing:

• Linkblog - as defined in the article as a user feature / application
• Link log - the thing in the image, presumably "feature of computing systems" / telco systems (PBX)

I propose:

• split the article into two different stubs, as there is enough material for each, and each if separately notable. E.g.
  • linkblog - the user feature/application - this is a much more common / specific term for this practice
  • link log - The jjk thesis (and the image which came from there apparently) uses "link log" and the Avaya citation says "link-log". Zero use of a single word "linklog".
  • Turn linklog into a disambiguation page for both of those ^^^

Tantek (talk) 18:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)