Jump to content

Talk:Line 3 (Chongqing Rail Transit)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Line 3, Chongqing Rail Transit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Line 1, Chongqing Rail Transit which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:10, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Route map upside down

[edit]

Hello, maps are commonly orientated to the north, but the route map runs from south to north. And in this case, where "CRT Line 3 ... runs from north to south", it is doubly confusing. Regards, Anna Catarina (talk) 21:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Anna Catarina Hi, these routemaps are arranged by the order of the station number, since "north to south" or "west to east" is not a very clear and universal standard, especially when you have a line runs in NE-SW or other ambiguous directions, e.g. Line 9 or Line 18 in this particular rail system. David Xuang (talk) 22:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello David, well, that is my knowledge behind my question: routes like roads or railways should - in my eyes- be mapped (and described in text) like their official route orientation, because there is an official 0 km/mi starting point. And commonly, station numbers will follow this route mileage. Unluckily, like in this article and the articles about CRT Line 3 in other languages, there is a messing up of route orientation, because there is no source about official mileage. This is, why I did not start to work on this as long there is no proof for the correct orientation. Where is the source for the official mileage of CRT lines? Regards, Anna Catarina (talk) 10:40, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]