Talk:Line 1 (Shenzhen Metro)

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Transportation in China task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Trains: Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

This article lacks references.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Shenzhen Metro/1.

Lacking infos

1. How long does the train run from Luohu to the Airport? 2. How long have to walk (metres and/or minutes) from the airport station to the check-in counters?

84.73.123.149 (talk) 00:24, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 January 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Per WP:IAR, I have decided to bypass the formal seven-day waiting period and go ahead with the move. There is already strong precedent to support it, such as the successful RM mentioned by the nominator (which was virtually identical to this one), Jc86035's RfC, and the NYC subway articles referred to by ToThAc. It probably could have been considered uncontroversial in the first place. Biblio (talk) 18:00, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same as Talk:Line_1_(Beijing_Subway)#Requested_move_29_December_2017. A metro system is not a place. feminist (talk) 13:56, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Is the current list (based on "Line 1", Line 2 ... presumably) exhaustive? I'm still a bit apprehensive, if commas create problems, how about naming them to "Shenzhen Metro Line 1", for example? No News ! 14:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Newfraferz87: There was an RfC about this, though only several editors participated because it's not the most interesting topic. It would be inconsistent with the articles which don't need disambiguators like Daxing line, and it would imply "Shanghai Metro" etc. to be part of the titles. Jc86035 (talk) 14:46, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not exhaustive. Other pages can be moved as well. feminist (talk) 16:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support, except the Chongming and Pujiang lines do not need their disambiguators. I would prefer "(abandoned proposal)" but "(defunct)" should probably be fine, and the articles might not need to exist (could be merged into an article on expansion of the metro or something?) if the proposals are abandoned. Jc86035 (talk) 14:46, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Disambiguators removed. feminist (talk) 16:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. With regard to the defunct lines, I echo Jc86035's sentiment, I think maybe we don't need an article for each one, could maybe go into one article called List of cancelled Shanghai Metro lines or merged into an article about expansion/Shanghai Metro main article itself. Heights^{(Want to talk?)} 19:07, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy support per precedent set by the New York City subways (1 (New York City Subway service), for example), and the fact that the identifiers should probably be there anyways. ToThAc (talk) 21:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.