Talk:Linda Melvern

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Rwanda

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rwanda (assessed as Mid-importance).

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I've come across this page through my research, for which I am including Ms. Melvern's books as sources for my thesis. The first thing I noticed was that the page was clunky and undivided, and did not include a Bibliography. I also noticed that it was very unbalanced, and seems to be deliberately set up in a way that discredits the author. To find a list of her works, I went on her website, and noticed that on the top bar of her website, she had included a post which describes the vandalism her Wikipedia has undergone - but I cannot find any record of this in the page edit history, which seems strange? I have cleaned up the page, and need to do further work on cleaning up bare URLs. I will also be reviewing the content of the page to give a more balanced outlook. It is fair to include the criticism of scholars such as Reyntjens and Thompson, but it is unfair to include that in isolation, ignoring the significant praise she has achieved from others, and her considerable expertise on the subject. If anyone can explain why I can't find any of the edits described here on her website: https://lindamelvern.com/wikipedia/ that would be amazing! Thanks Africanedits (talk) 13:46, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Africanedits They were revision deleted due to containing WP:BLP violations (against someone other than Melvern). It may be helpful to separate popular versus scholarly responses to Melvern's work as has been done on other controversial articles related to this topic. The article was not "vandalized" against Melvern. I believe she may be referring to a series of edits around 11 December 2020 in which an IP editor identifying as the article subject removed critical reviews and replaced them with praise, which was reverted by experienced editors. Such biased editing is highly frowned upon at Wikipedia, see WP:COI. (t · c) buidhe 19:08, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Buidhe Thanks, very useful. I hadn't appreciated that context, as I couldn't look through the edits in question! Agree with you - I think the article should detail the scholarly responses to each of her works, but at present, nearly all those responses seem to be about Intent to Deceive. I've updated all of the Rwanda books in the 'Critical Response' section - any feedback welcome. Africanedits (talk) 10:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]