Jump to content

Talk:Liminal space (aesthetic)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 01:41, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Okay! This should be all for now. Nice article; it was fun to read! I have left some comments below and placed this article on hold for the time being. Please ping me once you have addressed my concerns so that I may know when to respond. Thanks! 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 02:43, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nice work! I am more than happy with all the changes that have been made including the addition of another citation and am now happy to pass this article for GA status. Congratulations! Hope to see more of your work in the future—GA or otherwise, 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 04:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio check

[edit]

Earwig says good to go. Quotations usable per WP:COPYQUOTE.

Files

[edit]

File:Royal York Hallway.JPG: good, CC-BY-SA 3.0, taken and uploaded to Commons by registered user.

Prose

[edit]
  • Suggest linking liminal place instead of liminality as a valid redirect (liminality may be linked in later sentences).
  • Is it perhaps possible to add one or more sentences regarding the concept of liminality in relation to physical locations? Or, is the Internet aesthetic ultimately unrelated to the concept as a whole?
  • I added a little more. I think the broader concept of liminality is inspiration for, rather than an essential part of, liminal space imagery, so I don't think going into great detail is necessary. A reader can easily refer to the "Liminality" page for more info. GenericWikiUser1 (talk) 02:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Research has attributed" – only one source is cited. If the information presented is from only a single source then change the text to something like "Research by Alexander Diel and Michael Lewis of the Journal of Environmental Psychology […]" etc. Same goes for the lead.
  • I have never seen em dashes used with the omission of an initial space and inclusion of a succeeding space before. Are you sure this is correct? I could be wrong—in which case, apologies!
  • The article is great and covers the subject very well, but due to its length I must ask—can anymore information be added at all? I saw that § Photography and Internet culture on the article Liminality is longer than this article. I do see that most of the cited sources on said section are not RS, however is there any other RS sources (perhaps other academic works?) on the liminal spaces aesthetic that could be added to this article?
  • Yeah, as you've said the sources in that section aren't the best so I haven't included some of the info. It mentions the artist Jeffrey Smart, but as the article is on the internet phenomenon specifically he may not need mention (since his works predate the internet aesthetic). I found one other academic work which I have now included in the article. GenericWikiUser1 (talk) 02:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Refs

[edit]

Spot check on all references show no concerns—they all support the article's content.

  • Ref 5 is missing a publication date. I believe it was published on 2 November 2020?
  • Ref 6: I believe "Bloody Disgusting!" should be "Bloody Disgusting" (omitting the exclamation)?

Other

[edit]

Cats good.

Also, thanks for the WP:ALT text!

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.