Talk:Limalama

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was delete.

I found this page last year and have been editing/expanding it. Limalama is a legitimate martial art, but not a lot has been written about it. In response to the comment about needing to demonstrate 'notability' I added pointers to some good references on the web and a Black Belt magazine article. I'm not sure of the protocol of removing the warning messages added by the 'editor' so I left it, would appreciate their removal or a response giving more information about what is still 'advertising' or 'not notable'. Also the real name of the art is "Limalama", not "Lima Lama" although both are used, not clear there is an easy way to fix the top level name or if it even matters. Johnha 01:00, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

The format of a lot of the references need to be changed and I don't know what applies to what. Claims like military decoration need reliable sources do ing a quick run though now but needs more. --Nate1481 22:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citation format needed ==

It is stated that the following sentence needs a citation. "Solomon Esquivel also gives credit to Tu'umamao Tuiolosega in writings which were distributed to some of his students.[citation needed] "

I was a student, and I have the writings, yet I've no idea how to "cite" that. Suggestions? DrJBN Oct17, 2007

I don't know if you can submit such a document to wikipedia, but that may be a possiblity; Scan the writings and then upload them to wikipedia as an original research item. Another possibility may be to upload it somewhere else on the net then provide a link to that location. I'm not experienced in the process of adding an image to wikipedia, but I can help you in uploading an image elsewhere.

Either way the first step is to get the writings scanned. Have you done this already? User5802 00:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Solomon Kaihewalu

Needs his own article

User5802 06:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits ======

The page seems to flip back and forth between versions, with the latest big switch initiated 18:50, 17 November 2007 Violetriga (Talk | contribs) (4,385 bytes) (→Development - remove POV/unencyclopedic content that was poorly written). Some edits here in the talk page regarding large changes would be helpful.

One thing that was removed was the statment, "Perspectives on Limalama's development vary. On the Limalama website Tu'umamao Tuiolosega is given credit.[1] Solomon Esquivel also gives credit to Tu'umamao Tuiolosega in writings which were distributed to some of his students.[citation needed] Some consider Limalama to be the result of a combination of efforts from the members of the original Limalama organization.[2]" While this might appear POV, I'm not sure it is. It appears to me more as a statement to the observation that POVs regarding the origin have some variance.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Limalama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130529071505/http://www.limalama.net/Tinobio.htm to http://www.limalama.net/Tinobio.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:23, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]