Talk:Lilian Wyles

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Exchange of views taking place on Headbomb's User talk page

Moved from User talk:Headbomb. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:45, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave it to others to sort this out with you and take a look in a few months' time. I find disputes take up too much precious Wikipedia time. Bmcln1 (talk) 13:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bmcln1 I don't really see what there is to dispute or "sort out" in the first place. The section IS empty, those categories WERE duplicated. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:45, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with the categories. I have made my view on the empty section clear. Bmcln1 (talk) 16:53, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, no, you haven't. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:00, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Please add section head only when you have a section to head." Bmcln1 (talk) 17:19, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The section heading was already there. It was added prior to Headbomb's edit. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:39, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Jonesey, I'll remove it then. Cheers, Bmcln1 (talk) 18:02, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]