Talk:Lil iROCC Williams

This article was nominated for deletion on September 24, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

A7?

Lol. See WP:MUSIC. Chubbles 04:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Numerous press reviews coming, as the deleter has threatened A1 deletion. I need a few minutes. Chubbles 04:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a competition, it's not about how many album reviews you add to the article.--Tasco 0 04:55, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple reviews substantiates him under WP:MUSIC criterion 1, in addition to his already meeting criterion 4. Chubbles 04:57, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But the article does not aport almost nothing. It's applicable to WP:CSD#A1 anyways.

What is it missing? I'll continue to add content until you're satisfied. What else would you like to know? Chubbles 05:02, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, it's not a competion. And much more, you don't have to "satisfied" me (that sounded gay, by the way).

Trust me, I know how you feel right now. You don't want this to be deleted, but look it from another perspective. It's a short article.--Tasco 0 05:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Short articles on a notable subject are better than no article on a notable subject. Putting up a stub encourages people to expand them, while the lack of an article encourages them to look elsewhere. Chubbles 05:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh really? If stubs messages encourages people to expand an article, then if an article it's not even created yet it should encourages people even more. Why this one wasn't?--Tasco 0 05:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That makes no sense. There are significant barriers to starting articles, and there are no barriers to editing existing articles. Chubbles 05:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lil iROCC Williams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007112743/http://www.gospelmusicbites.com/2008/08/26/irocc-williams-is-back-with-a-new-album-born-a-king-on-jus-rocc-entertainment/ to http://www.gospelmusicbites.com/2008/08/26/irocc-williams-is-back-with-a-new-album-born-a-king-on-jus-rocc-entertainment/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]