Talk:Likelihoodist statistics
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Rohde (2014)
[edit]Rohde (2014) is on topic for this article, but the quality of the book seems low to me. Do readers benefit from being pointed to it? SolidPhase (talk) 11:37, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- @SolidPhase Agree that it's not a very sophisticated book, but it seems useful: there aren't many likelihoodist textbooks (with your help, there are 4 listed), and so we'd at least want a short "Textbooks" subsection, so including it there and noting in the prose isn't excessive.
- Thanks for adding more references (and cleaning them up!); Pawitan (2001) was the main one I'd been aware of, and Rodhe (2014) came up a few places too.
- —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 17:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- Sure—that makes sense. I am very much glad that this article has been created. SolidPhase (talk) 20:26, 16 March 2019 (UTC)