Talk:Like That (Future, Metro Boomin and Kendrick Lamar song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: LunaEclipse (talk · contribs) 12:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 02:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Hi, @LunaEclipse. I think I'll be reviewing the article at the end of the month, although I want that to happen sooner. My apologies for that. Best, Santi (talk) 02:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pollosito, take your time, I won't mind at all. — 🌙Eclipse ^(talk) ^(contribs) 14:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you move the present source to the body of the article. Refs in this section only apply if it's too short or one paragraph long. Santi (talk) 14:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done 🌙Eclipse ^(talk) ^(contribs) 11:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As "Wilburn Holding Co." isn't an alternative name for the song, please remove bold text. Santi (talk) 04:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems absurdly short to me. Could you put information about the album it belongs to? In articles about songs they usually do that. Santi (talk) 13:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. 🌙Eclipse ^(talk) ^(contribs) 14:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The ref 2 doesn't mention that "First Person Shooter" is part of For All the Dogs. Although I know it is out of a sense of logic, at least I would prefer to verify those specific details. Santi (talk) 14:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done 🌙Eclipse ^(talk) ^(contribs) 11:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Record producer Metro Boomin announced a collaborative album with rapper Future in an interview by Flaunt Magazine, set to release in 2023. He had saved a few tracks he produced for the latter for the album. First, I see in the reference that it says only "collaboration", not "collaborative album". Second, I don't see any mention of saved tracks, or I got lost from reading so much (I almost fell asleep, in fact, I'm not in my season of wanting to read LOL). Santi (talk) 17:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done 🌙Eclipse ^(talk) ^(contribs) 11:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pollosito: I have addressed your comments, you may continue with the review. lunaeclipse ^(talk) 20:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@LunaEclipse: Thank you for remembering. I will address the article at the same time as the other one I am reviewing, but not today, because I am on my cell phone, and it is hard for me to manage Wikipedia with that and that is why I hate it. Santi (talk) 22:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a better reference to confirm the trailer other than the trailer itself? Santi (talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Done lunaeclipse ^(talk) 23:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It would be a good idea to put information about the tracklist and what position it was there. Santi (talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- In progress lunaeclipse ^(talk) 23:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Archiving mising: ref 1, 4, 5, 6 and 8. Santi (talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Done lunaeclipse ^(talk) 23:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pipe Revolt to Revolt (TV network). Santi (talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Done lunaeclipse ^(talk) 23:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pollosito: I apologize for not addressing these earlier. Was busy reading Homestuck. lunaeclipse ^(talk) 23:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LunaEclipse: No problem. I'm also busy, but in finishing high school and in this FAC LOL. Santi (talk) 23:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LunaEclipse: I believe in you. However, this article really has many problems with original research covered by a misleading prose. Sorry, but I don't think it should be a good item under the state it is in. I prefer to give you a month to base yourself on other new GAs to improve this one, and then you ping me and we continue with the review. Santi (talk) 03:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Pollosito, shouldn't you fail the nom then? — lunaeclipse ^(talk) 01:58, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  @LunaEclipse: I think so, only if you're not available to fix in the way mentioned above. I don't want to do that, but, if it's the best decision... Santi (talk) 05:04, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  @LunaEclipse: Seriously I don't want to do this, but since neither the reviewer nor the nominator apparently are interested in working on this, I'll close the review as Failed. Santi (talk) 23:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]