Talk:Lights Up
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lights Up article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Lights Up is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 04:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the music video for Harry Styles's song "Lights Up" was interpreted as a "bisexual anthem" by critics and viewers due to it being released on the National Coming Out Day? Source: [1][2][3]
- Reviewed: I Did Something Bad
Improved to Good Article status by Ashleyyoursmile (talk). Self-nominated at 08:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC).
- Article promoted to GA on 21 January, long enough, neutral and plagiarism free. Hook interesting and referenced. QPQ done. There's a tag that stated the image need a more detailed non-free use rationale, but since the article got promoted to GA anyway I'm assuming it's fine. Corachow (talk) 10:18, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment on ALT1: Probably remove "signature" and replace it with "the rock styles of his previous releases". HĐ (talk) 15:34, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Hatnote
[edit]As this is the primary topic, a navigational hatnote to other topics of the same name should be included. There is currently one page with the same name, as to whether it links to the redirect or the redirect's destination, I'm not fussed, but it does need to be included. EleniSpelmen, however, has removed it twice, claiming that "the link to the page doesn't exist" (despite the fact that links to redirects aren't broken). What does everyone else think about this? Sean Stephens (talk) 23:18, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- The hatnote should be included as readers may be looking for the Flight Facilities song. It is more likely that people will be looking up this song, but the hatnote would be beneficial regardless. Aoba47 (talk) 03:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- I agree. Because I was reverted, I thought it best to follow BRD before attempting to return it. Awaiting further discussion before I do anything, however. Sean Stephens (talk) 11:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have not appeared on the main page
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- Old requests for peer review
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are featured articles
- FA-Class song articles
- FA-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- FA-Class Pop music articles
- Low-importance Pop music articles
- Pop music articles
- FA-Class R&B and Soul Music articles
- Low-importance R&B and Soul Music articles
- WikiProject R&B and Soul Music articles