Talk:Lighthouse Digest

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Lighthouses Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lighthouses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lighthouses and other water navigational aids on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LighthousesWikipedia:WikiProject LighthousesTemplate:WikiProject LighthousesLighthouses articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge with Doomsday List

The Doomsday List is a feature of the Lighthouse Digest and it should appear as such in the article, within a subsection. On its own, this article has a weak notability case. According to point 4 (WP:MERGEREASON) a shared context like this one is a candidate for merger. Both are online, under the same site and editorial advisory. See here: http://www.lighthousedigest.com/news/doomsdaystory.cfm Both articles are small, in fact, too small for their reach and scope. Separated they do not serve Wikipedia nor the preservationist community well. Together, they can even open space for similar lists, like the one for Puerto Rico’s lighthouses (published by the same digest). Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 18:27, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The merger of these two small articles would be beneficial...Jokulhlaup (talk) 17:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and

Done Klbrain (talk) 22:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]