Talk:Light writing

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Animation: Stop motion Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Stop motion work group.

This is a new form of stop motion animation currently in use. For instance, it was recently seen in a national sprint ad campaign. Many examples can also be found on youtube after searching for "light writing".

removal of speedy deletion

I removed the tags because this is simply not under {{db-bio}}. It's by no means an article yet. It has no cited verifiability or notability, and it could thus be challenged on those, but that just needs a little time by the creator. Fiddle Faddle 13:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's the deal with citing a random post from a message board that has nothing to do with anything? (205.243.71.71 (talk) 04:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

how to add images etc??

this is a new form of art and deserves a page, please point me in the right direction to ad images/video User:Thecinematographer

Image addition is simple. You use the "Upload file" link in the left hand margin, but must be certain that yo do not upload material that is the copyright of others unless you have and can show to Wikipedia their permission.

Video is not addable. Wikipedia does not have the extension that allows embedding of video.

That something "deserves a page" is a sentiment that many people may agree with. But "deserves" and "qualifies for" are different. I believe this does qualify for a page, but, and this is important, the page must assert the notability of the topic with citations. I am placing a "placeholder" for citations on the article page. These uss a pair or tags to flag them. They work thus:

Between <ref> and </ref> you place the citation, ideally using {{Cite web}} or another citation template to expand the reference. This then goes automatically into the referecnes. The best references/citations have a short quotation from the cited source. "Short" is important otherwise copyright is breached. Look at WP:RS to understand Reliable Sources.

This is part of wikification. Other parts are to wikilink frok this article to other relevant articles, and to wikilink to this article form other relevant articles.

The {{Hangon}} message is only relevant for Speedy Deletion. Please only use it to gain a short elay when an article is nominated for that. Templates such as {{Wikify}} "just" mean "please wikify". Fiddle Faddle 06:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for all your help, for editing the page, and keeping me out of the "deserves" gutter and on the "qualifies" highway, is the page looking somewhat respectable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecinematographer (talk • contribs) 14:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lightwriting 1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Lightwriting 1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Lightwriting 1.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:07, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lightwriting 2.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Lightwriting 2.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Lightwriting 2.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Split? Merge?

So, I feel this is really about two different topics. Surveilluminescence which is really what the "Technique" section describes. Taking individual shots in a stop motion way, as opposed to "true" light writing which is a long exposure time and the light is waved around. Thoughts? If I don't hear anything, I'll just boldly split it, or better yet, have them both in this article under different headings. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 21:52, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Light writing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]