Talk:Life-cycle hypothesis

Opening heading

needs more information and a picture i might do this after my exam :P

Merger

Should be merged with Life-cycle Income Hypothesis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.222.120 (talk) 16:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article should be merged with Life-cycle Income Hypothesis --Mark S. 14:56, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

I have completed the merger. Now to better integrate the new information--MCSenia (Talk) 04:39, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion, Revert move based on publication data and linked not cited references within the document showing proper use

Because of new information available via Google Ngram(see linked chart)^[1], and because of not linked references within the page, I am recommending that the earlier move to the hyphenated version was incorrect and inconsistent with published works. This is only one of 2 out of 9 pages on the disambiguation page which is hyphenated. About the Google chart, the hyphenated version is not even listed in print publications scanned though 2008, only the fully linked and the separate words. These two types may if current trending on those lines is consistent, meet in about 80 years. Occurrences of the separate form still out number the linked form 5.2:1.3 . RowanHawkins (talk) 17:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://books.google.com/ngrams/interactive_chart?content=life+cycle%2Clifecycle%2C%5Blife-cycle%5D&case_insensitive=on&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=3

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:06, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Life cycle hypothesis → Life-cycle hypothesis –

Harder to parse by non-experts: hyphen accords with WP house style and many sources. $Tony (talk)$ 13:25, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. A simple matter of serving the interests of readers by applying WP's style guidelines. Noetica^Tea? 00:52, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:HYPHEN, i.e. correct English usage. — AjaxSmack 02:35, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I agree the title should have a hyphen, but Life-cycle hypothesis does not redirect to this article, it redirects to Intertemporal consumption. Is any disambiguation required? Jenks24 (talk) 17:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Look out for possible copyright violations in this article

This article has been found to be edited by students of the Wikipedia:India Education Program project as part of their (still ongoing) course-work. Unfortunately, many of the edits in this program so far have been identified as plain copy-jobs from books and online resources and therefore had to be reverted. See the India Education Program talk page for details. In order to maintain the WP standards and policies, let's all have a careful eye on this and other related articles to ensure that no material violating copyrights remains in here. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 12:30, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Life-Cycle Consumption Function.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:The Life-Cycle Consumption Function.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:44, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Changing article to reflect a joint-framework with the permanent income hypothesis

Increasingly, the life-cycle hypothesis by Modigliani and Brumberg and the permanent income hypothesis advanced by Friedman are seen as part of the same framework. Would it be possible to merge the two or at least link the two articles up? Benuel (talk) 23:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

India Education Program course assignment

This article was the subject of an educational assignment at Symbiosis School of Economics supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 20:05, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is this written by A. I. Quor/abot?

tmThe transitional sentences seem abrupt and unrelated as if the writer could not percieve an overall theme and plan. 2603:6081:403:DA88:F9A3:5E0E:A269:5809 (talk) 22:05, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[Google_Ngram_lifecycle_vs._life_cycle_vs._life-cycle-1] ttps://books.google.com/ngrams/interactive_chart?content=life+cycle%2Clifecycle%2C%5Blife-cycle%5D&case_insensitive=on&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=3

[1]