Jump to content

Talk:Liechtenstein at the 2016 Summer Olympics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liechtenstein at the 2016 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Liechtenstein at the 2016 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 19:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.

Capitalize Parade of Nations

Men's shouldn't be capitalized

Use a different verb: making a national record

Reword this: with a time of 8:38.19 seconds, being 8 seconds off

I do not think a hyphen is needed here: last-eight by

Reword this: Liechtenstein has however, won 9 medals at the Winter Olympics.

1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

After the intro, wikilink the first time something is mentioned in the main article, such as the athletes names.  Already done

Is that 'see also' link really necessary? I do not see how it is relevant.  Done

2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.

Are the national record times for Hassler accurate? I cannot read German, and the translator makes it look like it is not accurate. --Not sure. I believe I thought I was doing the 2012 Olympics and took it from here.

I also do not see where in the citation it says Meier set the national record, but I may be blind. --Added Liechtensteinian records page as a ref instead of BBC, see bottom of new ref.

2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.

I think the flag should have this added to the licensing section: {{Insignia}}  Done

6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Captions that are complete sentences require a period at the end of the sentence.  Done

7. Overall assessment.

You're right, I have edited the article to reflect that. Kees08 (talk) 20:07, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It's not a big deal, but it's usually literally the first that one notices. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Liechtenstein at the 2016 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Liechtenstein_at_the_2016_Summer_Olympics&oldid=1203207457"