Talk:Liebster Jesu, mein Verlangen, BWV 32

Liebster Jesu, mein Verlangen, BWV 32 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 3, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 10, 2016.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Bach composed the cantata for the Sunday after Epiphany, Liebster Jesu, mein Verlangen, BWV 32, as a dialogue of the Soul and Jesus, using elements of contemporary opera?

Classical music: Compositions

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Liebster Jesu, mein Verlangen, BWV 32/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 23:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 23:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Link Darmstadt in lede and history.

yes --GA

"Lehms treated the Gospel to an allegorical dialogue of Jesus and the Soul, staying close to the Gospel." -avoid rep of Gospel

removed the earlier wording at the end --GA

Why are the keys in the table all linked except B minor?

thank you --GA (because one source had e minor which was linked before, and when I changed I forgot to link)

"The keys and time signatures are taken from the book on all cantatas by the Bach scholar Alfred Dürr," -why not just mention the name of the book?

Do you think the title conveys how general that book is? meaning that facts about other cantatas can also be sourced to it? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:18, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You could word it like "The keys and time signatures are taken from xxx, a book by the Bach scholar Alfred Dürr which features facts about the cantatas".

That would be a rather long title in German (Die Kantaten von Johann Sebastian Bach), which is given in the ref anyway, - do you think it helps the English reader at this point? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:30, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh OK, don't worry then.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Looks fine.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]