Talk:Lichtenberg figure

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Chaos theory.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lightning

Is lightning itself an example of a Lichtenberg figure? According to the definition, it's when the dielectric strength is exceded, making the dielectric conductive. That sounds like lightning to me.

Lichtenberg Figures are most often used to describe branching electrical discharges (or electrical trees) that have been preseved on the surface of, or within, a solid dielectric. However, during dielectric breakdown in strongly non uniform high voltage electric fields, transient Lichtenberg Figures may also form within gases and dielectric liquids. However, the nature of the gaseous or fluid media does not allow a permanent record of their passage to be preserved (other than through photographic means). Lichtenberg Figures and lightning both exhibit fractal properties. The branching behavior, and even the approximate branching angle, are common characteristic of dielectric breakdown within all forms of matter. Hence the similarity in appearance to lightning. So, very strongly branched lightning (such as "anvil crawlers" or J Streamers) could indeed be called HUGE Lichtenberg Figures ... Bert 05:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

insufficient context

could someone please add a sentence or two defining the subject at the beginning of the article? Right now it jumps straight into who it's named after and how he discovered it, without actually specifying what it is. Thanks! Luvcraft 16:50, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I made some changes that should help define what they are in the initial sentence. Bert 23:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll go ahead and take off the template. Luvcraft 19:41, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adding more text to beginning of article and references

More information was added to the first paragraph. I'm also adding more references to help strengthen the veracity of the article. Bert (talk) 05:47, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Flags regarding references and leading paragraph removed - problems have been addressed. Bert (talk) 05:32, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for greatly improving the quality of the article. Reify-tech (talk) 12:33, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lichtenberg figure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402094547/http://www.lbk.ars.usda.gov/wewc/bof/fulgurites.htm to http://www.lbk.ars.usda.gov/wewc/bof/fulgurites.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:48, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]