Jump to content

Talk:Libyan interim Constitutional Declaration

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled]

[edit]

ok, so the translation which turned up on the internet is completely unreferenced, but at first glance it appears to be reasonably accurate and can be used as a guide for those not fluent in Arabic. It still must be treated with care, as it will contain inaccuracies, and possibly mistakes. The only official document is of course the one in Arabic issues by the NTC. --dab (𒁳) 12:07, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of course the blogosphere picked up on the sharia part ("zomg, sharia, thanks Obama"), completely ignoring the bits about freedom of religion, human rights, civil rights, rule of law and women's rights. There isn't a single Arab state at this time that can boast these (except, perhaps, soon, Iraq), so if the promises made in this document can actually lived up to, it would mean that Libya would be the first Arab country to make a decisive step towards an enlightened, civilized state free of clan nepotism and authoritarian terror.

Now the sharia is specified as the principal source of legislation. This means that the sharia would be taken as a standard gauge to be applied by default. Obviously, in cases where the sharia collides with constitutionally asserted rights, such as the non-discrimination of religious minorities, the constitutional rights will trump the sharia, as there is a difference between principal source (among other sources) and overruling principle. As the Guardian points out, the declaration is pretty much 100% what Libya's western allies had hoped for. So the sharia is still the principal source of legislation bit must probably be understood as a concession to the Islamists who would otherwise start whining about how the document proves the NTC is the west's lackey. --dab (𒁳) 09:00, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seal of the National Transitional Council (Libya).svg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Seal of the National Transitional Council (Libya).svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Women's Rights

[edit]

In article six of the translation listed as 'newer' at the bottom of the site, I find no reference to "the guarantee of the state upholding women's rights, granting full participation of women in politics" (copied from the article). The Constitutional Declaration says that "Libyans shall be equal before the law," and that "They shall enjoy equal civil and political rights, shall have the same opportunities, and be subject to the same public duties and obligations, without discrimination due to religion, doctrine, language, wealth, race, kinship, political opinions, and social status, tribal or eminent or familial loyalty." While sex/gender equality is implied under the first and (to an extent) second sentences, it is not explicitly put forth as the article implies (it is not listed in article six). I request that the article be modified to take into account this fact. In the interim, I've placed a 'dubious' tag on that section.  CKBrown1000 talk  18:29, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Libyan interim Constitutional Declaration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]