Talk:Liblogs

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 February 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Blogging (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles

74.98.218.238 16:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Editing for "wordiness" is only going to get the article deleted. It needs substance to it.[reply]

Extra words do not equal substance. Look at these two passages:

Liblogs was created as a reaction to The Blogging Tories and Progressive Bloggers. It began as a small list of links disseminated on Liberal blogs. In April 2005, a central website was created to aggregate content from member sites. Liblogs remained quite small until the 2006 federal election, when membership numbers swelled.

and

Initially, Liblogs was created as a reaction to The Blogging Tories and Progressive Bloggers. It began as a small list of links that different Liberals included on their blogs, but expanded into a website including aggregation of member blogs in April 2005. Liblogs remained small until the 2006 federal election, when new blogs began joining at a rate of almost 10 each week. By the end of the campaign, Liblogs was a regular Internet source of Liberal information.

Don't they say the same thing? 125.244.21.242 23:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite. The links weren't "disseminated". Also, it is a bit much to say "quite small". Adding "swelled" takes a lot away from the description. How much did it swell? Doesn't quanitity matter? Generally you would be right. However, the example you give goes too far. I am particularly opposed to all the information you removed in the first sentence. Jason Cherniak 04:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work! Maybe this is better than either version. I'll insert it:

Liblogs was created as a reaction to The Blogging Tories and Progressive Bloggers. It began as a small list of links included on Liberal blogs. In April 2005, a central website was created to aggregate content from member sites. During the 2006 federal election, the membership of Liblogs increased significantly.

Watchsmart 05:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liblogs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070514063444/http://www.canada.com/globaltv/quebec/story.html?id=fc923c75-dcb5-494f-9d40-4c3cef0e7643 to http://www.canada.com/globaltv/quebec/story.html?id=fc923c75-dcb5-494f-9d40-4c3cef0e7643

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Liblogs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:05, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]