Jump to content

Talk:Liberalism in South Africa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

needs better definition of liberal

[edit]

The def implied by the first paragraph is simply those parties that secured a representative and called themselves "liberal"? Is this true? Wouldn't it be better to have at least a vague mention of what being liberal in So Af meant? For example, did most "liberal" parties oppose apartheid? Did they have a major involvement in labor politics? Did they try to extend voting rights in some way? Did they have a predictable stance toward world affairs (e.g. the Cold War)? Were there perceptible British vs Boer factions and were the liberals more identified with one than the other. How about a sentence such as, Liberal parties were generally distinguished by mild-to-strong opposition to apartheid, support for labor interests during conflict, support for international liberation movements against colonialist or American-allied interests... Note that I know nothing about So Af politics, so maybe none of these points are distinctive or relevant, but those of you who wrote this should be able to come up with something better as a lead paragraph. The current one is both ungrammatical and uninformative. Dalembert 01:41, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed! And it seems it's been that way since you commented at the start of 2006. — Gk sa (talk) 22:21, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who is a liberal

[edit]

This article is rather shaky. It needs to mention "liberal" traditions in SA other than the Progressives/DP/DA succession, including significant parts of the ANC as well as smaller parties such as the Independent Democrats. Also worth mentioning is that the word Liberal has been despised frmo both the right (the NP used the disparaging term "liberalist") and the left (there was a great exchange between Biko and Donald Woods in the film Cry Freedom on this topic), but that nonetheless, values usually regarded as "liberal" have triumphed in the SA constitution, widely regarded as one of the most liberal in the world. Also that the DA is in some senses socially conservative, with absorption of former NNP supporters, support for the death penalty, etc.

Biko: "Ah, a true liberal!"
Woods: "It's not a title I'm ashamed of, though I know you regard it with some contempt."
Biko: "I just think that a white liberal who clings to all the advantages of his white world - jobs, housing, education, Mercedes - is perhaps not the person best qualified to tell blacks how they should react to apartheid."
Woods: "I wonder what sort of liberal you would make, Mr Biko, if you were the one who had the job, the house, and the Mercedes, and the whites lived in townships."

Zaian 16:43, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Agreed (relates to the above section as well). This article needs some serious focus applied to it. Right now it almost reads as if could be named "White liberalism in South Africa". The biggest problem is that, almost any party you place next to the old-style National Party, comes off as liberal - even the Freedom Front!
Suggestion: Create different sections for different "types" of liberalism. I'm thinking:
  • Classic Liberalism
  • Neo-Liberalism
  • Radical Liberalism

Any suggestions? — Gk sa (talk) 22:21, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image Image:ProgessivereformpartyCausus1976.jpeg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liberalism in South Africa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Liberalism_in_South_Africa&oldid=1212783319"