Talk:Li (neo-Confucianism)

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Social and political / Eastern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy
	Eastern philosophy

East Asia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles

This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 20 November 2008. Further details are available here.

Untitled

This page was specifically created to clear up the confusion between different characters all called "Li" in Confucianism.

In Chinese language and Confucian philosophy, there is Li, Li, Li and Li... they're all different characters but someone typing Li in Wikipedia will invariably click on the "Li" meaning ritual (which could look like it's related to the Li of principle (理), but it's nothing like it). Someone could also mix of one the Li and think it's the same term for "force" (力), like in modern science.

It's completely different. Me thinks Wiki needs a way of differentiating Li, Li and Li from Li.

Link

Thank you for this. I see that on the Chinese philosophy page, section "Concepts within Chinese philosophy", the reference for "Li" is to the Li (Confucian) page. Is that correct? Or should it link here? Hundovir (talk) 19:44, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are correct. Fixed. Caorongjin (talk) 23:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tao in Taoists.

The Li is not the reference to Daoism and to say this can be very misleading. Le is through correct ritual. Like blood going through the veins. Not the path. Health and wellbeing is very important. We should understand what we say before we talk on subjects like this. Zongqi (talk) 23:16, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]