Talk:Lhalu Tsewang Dorje

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Tibet

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lhalu's father appointed by the Qing

I had removed this passage from the intro, stating that Lhalu's father was a Qing appointee. For one thing, this does not belong in the lede. More importantly, however, Xinhua is not even close to being a reliable source for this type of information. Xinhua is a journalistic source, not a historical one. I wouldn't necessarily trust a statement from an unbiased journalist for historical accuracy, and Xinhua has the additional disadvantage of having to toe the party line. They would probably say that everyone in Tibet before 1912 was a Qing appointee.

Now, if this were an important point, then it would certainly make sense to teach the controversy. But since a) this is a fact about the subject's father, not about the subject himself, and b) it's not clear what the relevance is, I don't see why we can't just leave it out.—Greg Pandatshang (talk) 18:58, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the info to the Notes & references section so as not to give it undue importance.--Christian Lassure (talk) 09:31, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This information is not sourced to a reliable source. I don't think it should appear anywhere in Wikipedia.—Greg Pandatshang (talk) 23:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong on Lhalu's secession plot

I had removed this passage in which Strong is cited about Lhalu's purported secessionist activites. This was restored in a modified form a bit later. I don't understand why we should include this vague accusation from an outdated source written by partisan author who doesn't seem to be any kind of expert on Lhalu — the information she provides is apparently just based on what she heard at a show trial in 1959. What specific activities constituted Lhalu's "plotting for Tibet's secession from China", and how does Strong claim to know about this? She doesn't tell us.—Greg Pandatshang (talk) 19:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong was a witness to events and had access to information that few if any Western observers were allowed to be privy to. This is why she is cited. Besides, her sympathies are clearly indicated in the text.--Christian Lassure (talk) 09:31, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Was she a witness to any events related to Lhalu other than the struggle session in 1959? Even regarding that, we may wish to exercise some caution in citing her. The point isn't really that she's a Marxist. Phüntso Wangye is a Marxist as well, and I'm sure he would give a somewhat different account of the events of that era. Even regarding people who sympathise with the "democratic reforms" that era, some might be reliable as far as the facts that they observed personally, regardless of the interpretation that they give it, while others might not even be that reliable. It would be interesting to know how Strong is seen by most scholars.—Greg Pandatshang (talk) 23:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lhalu Tsewang Dorje. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110522202405/http://en.tibet.cn/en_index/hac/t20050310_276223.htm to http://en.tibet.cn/en_index/hac/t20050310_276223.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:09, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]