Jump to content

Talk:Lexicon (card game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Lexicon (cardgame))

Now it's a stub

[edit]

After so much copied/pasted info was removed from the article—justifiably—it isn't start-class any longer. I've changed it to a stub and will add the appropriate template to the article.

http://www.gtoal.com/wordgames/rules/lexicon.html might be a good reference for the article, but do not copy & paste it here, as was done before. Thanks! — Geekdiva (talk) 03:45, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability tag

[edit]

Does this article still warrant the {{notability}} tag? Is there something else that needs to be done to resolve the issues pertaining to that tag? Mindmatrix 15:08, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk04:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Master card for Waddingtons 1933 edition
Master card for Waddingtons 1933 edition

5x expanded by Mindmatrix (talk). Self-nominated at 14:33, 25 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Lexicon (card game); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article 5x expanded, passes earwig and is adequately sourced. No close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is interesting, cited inline, and verified. Image is licensed under Creatives Commons and no copyright issues. QPQ done. Nom good to go. Pseud 14 (talk) 17:18, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]