Talk:Lex Claudia de nave senatoris

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

I think that your article is very good. You answer the "who what when where why" questions quite well. The only thing that I could suggest would be to explain why barring large capacity ships hurt the wealthy senators. I would explain what kinds of trade they profited from and why that depended on the ship capacity. Also just as a side note, I noticed that you said Q. Claudius was tribune of the plebs, but then later you say he was the only senator that supported the law. It's probably just a careless mistake, but I would fix that. Otherwise the article is very good.--Andy Jain 01:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that overall the article was solid. However, I have a few suggestions. I think you should remove the Ancient Rome stub because this article is no longer considered "complete", and is thus no longer a stub. Also, I would suggest you internally link important words. First, I do not think you necessarily need to link to 218 BC, but if you want to that should be OK; however, you probably should internally link to Flaminius, Punic War, Senate, Tribune of the Plebs, Roman Republic, Italian peninsula and amphorae, but these are all just suggestions. Also, you should probably use Flaminius' full name because he held the very important position of consul during this time period. Finally, you might want to add in more time references so the reader has a better feel about when these specific events are happening. And also, although this is not a necessity, but you might want to try to organize the article into different sections (origin, history, etc.). Otherwise, I thought the article was good. You did a great job of answering why and how the law came about, and you really addressed the "why significant?" question. However, I think you should note why senators making money was frowned upon (especially when related to trade); maybe elaborate on the trade issue here. Most of these are just minor changes that should be easy to make, and overall I thought the article was good.--Brian Mikolajczyk

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lex Claudia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120831060912/http://web.upmf-grenoble.fr:80/Haiti/Cours/Ak/ to http://web.upmf-grenoble.fr/Haiti/Cours/Ak

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]