Talk:Lewis and Clark Viaduct

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lewis and Clark Viaduct article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kansas Mid‑importance

	Kansas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kansas City High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about Kansas City, Missouri, and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Kansas CityWikipedia:WikiProject Kansas CityTemplate:WikiProject Kansas CityKansas City articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

On 9 May 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Intercity Viaduct to Lewis and Clark Viaduct. The result of the discussion was moved.

Rename to Lewis and Clark viaduct

We should rename this page to the Lewis and Clark viaduct because that’s been the westbound bridge official name since dedication and the eastbound bridges name since 1969. 2601:88:200:3610:252C:EA78:E097:CA87 (talk) 00:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Imzadi1979, this is what i was talking about. 174.206.160.153 (talk) 19:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have better luck making a proper move request per WP:RM. Please note though that the formal request mechanism requires some time for actual discussion to take place. A single post like that is not discussion. Imzadi 1979 → 19:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 May 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 23:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Intercity Viaduct → Lewis and Clark Viaduct – Nobody calls both bridges the Intercity Viaduct, that a generic name that only refers to the eastbound span. Since its the official name anyways, I propose renaming it to Lewis and Clark viaduct. 174.206.160.153 (talk) 20:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Imzadi1979, I did it like you asked. 174.206.160.153 (talk) 21:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Imzadi1979, can you discuss? 174.206.160.153 (talk) 23:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lean support on the rename. I'd be neutral, but more recent sources cited in the article would support the idea that the official name is the common name. Imzadi 1979 → 23:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.