Jump to content

Talk:Lewtrenchard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Lew Trenchard)

Population

[edit]

This needs to be supplied.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 17:32, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Churchyard

[edit]

Removed from article: "There are also two features of the Church and graveyard which are considerabely unique. First is the cross above the door, not unlike many churches, this one however is upside down. Second are the inhabitants of the graveyard, many of the stones have strange or mythalogical markings on them. And oddly for the time (19th century) according to the stones many laid to rest were over one hundred years old." Such unusual statements need verifiable references: the anachronistic inscriptions are explained by the fact that many of these have been transferred from Staverton by Sabine Baring-Gould.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 21:45, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This seems even more improbable today, even the third item. Would fail on NPOV and non-notable criteria.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 09:35, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 January 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested, unopposed. Dekimasuよ! 07:55, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Lew TrenchardLewtrenchard – This is the name of both the settlement and civil parish per the Ordnance Survey, a quick look at Google shows that the current name is far less common. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:48, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.