Talk:Levon Khachigian

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Australia: Sydney / Education Low‑importance

	Australia portal Levon Khachigian is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 August 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Verifiability

Hello! I am a UNSW employee editing this article to contain only verifiable information. If you have any concerns re: WP:COI, please contact me via my talk page. Tim Bennett (talk) 04:34, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incomprehensible sentence

What is meant by " He is the inventor of the experimental drug DZ13, which can allegedly treat skin cancer without skin cancer without surgery, eye diseases, and asthma." Hpow does he claim to 'treat skin cancer without skin cancer"???? Does "without" apply to "eye diseases, and asthma" or just to "surgery"? Edison (talk) 04:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed? Please review now, thanks. --Qwerty Binary (talk) 14:25, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 4 December 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Include following paragraph under "Investigation" section:

Six of Khachigian's research articles have so far been retracted and one corrected due to unresolved concerns over missing or manipulated data.^[1] At Pubpeer.com, an important discussion forum for published research, fifteen articles co-authored by Khachigian are discussed due to problematic issues.^[2] ^[3] ABC News in Australia critically discussed the many problematic issues related to Khachigian's research in October 2019 ^[4]

All the information is fully documented. Pubpeer.com is a well known discussion forum for scientists, where scientist discuss published literature. Pubpeer perform a strict quality control of all posts published there. Moroks (talk) 12:23, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit protected}} template. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:34, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Protected edit request on 5 December 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change: Include under the head line “Investigations”, before the sentence “None of the multiple different…”:

Six of Khachigian's research articles have been retracted and one corrected due to unresolved concerns over missing or manipulated data. ^[1] ^[2] ^[3]

Change: Include at the end of the same paragraph, after the sentence: “…there was no finding of research misconduct.[29]:

This conclusion has recently been challenged.^[4]

Reason for change: Important to include critical information from another point of view. I have removed links to Pubpeer, and added more reliable references (RetractionWatch). This edition overrides my previous edit request. Thanks. Moroks (talk) 12:05, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit protected}} template. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:34, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Protected edit request on 10 December 2019

The proposed amendments in Moroks’ 5 December 2019 Edit Request (overriding the 4 December request) seem appropriate except:

Change: Under the headline “Investigations”:

Amend Moroks’ proposed sentence “Six research articles …”, to be inserted before “None of the multiple different …”, to “Six research articles co-authored by Khachigian have been retracted and one corrected.^[1]”

Reason for change:

(a) None of the publisher retraction notices for any of the 6 research articles refer to manipulated data;^[2] (b) Several of the publisher retraction notices give no reason for the withdrawals;^[3] (c) Although data manipulation was initially alleged, the independent external expert panels of inquiry investigating these articles found genuine error or honest oversight, not deliberate or intentional conduct.^[4] ^[5] This amended sentence is factual and unbiased.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by HansonPeabody (talk • contribs) 21:18, 10 December 2019 (UTC) [reply]

References

Protected edit request on 10 December 2019 (signed)

The proposed amendments in Moroks’ 5 December 2019 Edit Request (overriding the 4 December request) seem appropriate except:

Change: Under the headline “Investigations”:

Amend Moroks’ proposed sentence “Six research articles …”, to be inserted before “None of the multiple different …”, to “Six research articles co-authored by Khachigian have been retracted and one corrected.^[1]”

Reason for change:

(a) None of the publisher retraction notices for any of the 6 research articles refer to manipulated data;^[2] (b) Several of the publisher retraction notices give no reason for the withdrawals;^[3] (c) Although data manipulation was initially alleged, the independent external expert panels of inquiry investigating these articles found genuine error or honest oversight, not deliberate or intentional conduct.^[4] ^[5] This amended sentence is factual and unbiased.

HansonPeabody (talk) 21:35, 10 December 2019 (UTC) HansonPeabody (talk) 21:35, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

[1] ttp://retractiondatabase.org/RetractionSearch.aspx#?auth%3dKhachigian%252c%2bLevon%2bM

[2] ttps://pubpeer.com/search?q=Levon+Khachigian

[3] ttps://pubpeer.com/search?q=Khachigian+L

[4] ttps://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-10-17/unsw-skin-cancer-levon-khachigian-allegations-and-retractions/11585768

[5] ttp://retractionwatch.com/2013/08/12/aussie-university-halts-trials-of-skin-cancer-drug-whose-developer-has-four-retractions/

[6] ttps://retractionwatch.com/2013/11/04/jbc-issues-correction-for-paper-by-khachigian-who-has-had-four-others-retracted/

[7] ttp://retractionwatch.com/2019/01/14/an-australian-university-cleared-a-cancer-researcher-of-misconduct-hes-now-retracted-six-papers/

[8] ttps://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-10-17/unsw-skin-cancer-levon-khachigian-allegations-and-retractions/11585768

[9] ttp://retractiondatabase.org/RetractionSearch.aspx#?auth%3dKhachigian%252c%2bLevon%2bM

[10] ttp://retractiondatabase.org/RetractionSearch.aspx#?auth%3dKhachigian%252c%2bLevon%2bM.

[11] ttp://retractiondatabase.org/RetractionSearch.aspx#?auth%3dKhachigian%252c%2bLevon%2bM

[12] ttps://retractionwatch.com/2015/12/15/cancer-researcher-cleared-of-misconduct-inquiry-finds-genuine-error-or-honest-oversight/

[13] ttps://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/unsw-clears-levon-khachigian-of-all-allegations-of-research-misconduct/news-story/f707b2c14b5cc251a4db5fcbe5778002

[14] ttp://retractiondatabase.org/RetractionSearch.aspx#?auth%3dKhachigian%252c%2bLevon%2bM

[15] ttp://retractiondatabase.org/RetractionSearch.aspx#?auth%3dKhachigian%252c%2bLevon%2bM.

[16] ttp://retractiondatabase.org/RetractionSearch.aspx#?auth%3dKhachigian%252c%2bLevon%2bM

[17] ttps://retractionwatch.com/2015/12/15/cancer-researcher-cleared-of-misconduct-inquiry-finds-genuine-error-or-honest-oversight/

[18] ttps://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/unsw-clears-levon-khachigian-of-all-allegations-of-research-misconduct/news-story/f707b2c14b5cc251a4db5fcbe5778002

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]