Talk:Levels of evidence
Appearance
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Unsourced and copy pasted lede
[edit]whoever started this stub, used the NCI definition without attribution! I found out by trying to improve this unsourced page, adding sections etc. Not so great....--Wuerzele (talk) 10:48, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- Wuerzele Actually you don't need to attribute the NCI ;). It's PD, but I get your point. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 18:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, CFCF / courtesy to Wuerzele; Actually, although WP:COPYVIO is not at issue, you most certainly do need to attribute PD sources please. Wikipedia's PD policy reads, "Whether copyright-expired or in the public domain for other reasons, material from public-domain sources is welcome on Wikipedia, but such material must be properly attributed". In addition to possible plagiarism, the missing attribution impedes future editors' work, as was pointed out. But as you say, you get the point, so no worries. FeatherPluma (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Coordination with Hierarchy of evidence
[edit]The material in the article on Hierarchy of evidence seems quite similar. I suggest close coordination or merging these articles. --Lbeaumont (talk) 03:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- I agree with you, Lbeaumont.--Wuerzele (talk) 07:23, 14 June 2017 (UTC)